Lesson Reflection #3

A few weeks ago I decided to try a lesson directly out of the Syllabus & Materials module coursebook with my adult eikaiwa. It is a task-based lesson focused on written English. While the aim of the lesson is to get the students to predict the text and then share information about the text in order to create a more complete story, it turned into a different type of lesson because the students didn't really understand what they were doing and why. At the end of the lesson they said they would like to do something like this again because now they understand what the point of all the different steps is. It was a learning process for both of us.

Step 1: I wrote the title of the article up on the board and asked students to predict what the article was about:

'Excuse me, I've just jumped off the Empire State Building'

Step 2: I divided the class into two groups (3 students in each group) and gave each group key words from the article (jig-saw activity). Each group had a different list. With this list students were supposed to create a story based on these facts. Instead of trying to piece it together, they created wild stories that might be related to these hints.

List A Clues:

John Helms, a young artist - took a lift - awoke half an hour later - 85^th floor - gave up the idea - knocked on a window - I poured myself a stiff drink - families offered him a home for the holidays.

List B Clues:

Decided to kill himself - 86th floor - a 1,000 feet below - a two feet ledge - Bill Steckman, who was working there - Christmas was not such a bad time

Step 3: After solidifying their story (adding lots of their own creativity), they sent an ambassador to the other group to exchange stories. The problem with this step was that because their stories had become so wild and off the wall, it wasn't possible to pick out the real tid-bits to improve their own stories. Perhaps the clues just didn't provide enough information to make a coherent story without adding lots of other information. Maybe they should have been given more clues to connect!

Step 4: The ambassadors returned and retold the other stories. But again, this was only useful as a retelling excercise, they couldn't take the information to improve their story because they had all made up so much information that wasn't given in the clues.

Step 5: Each group presented their story and we discussed the liklihood of each. Not very likely considering one group had decided it was Santa's sleigh who had gotten stuck on the top of the Empire State Building.

Step 6: The finally got to read the article. At this point they were curious to read the article and they read it very quickly given they had been exposed to hints and some key words/ideas already. So the steps that came before were useful in getting them to read it quickly, instead of spending a long time trying to get through each word, which they often get caught up in.

Step 7: Discuss the story and compare it to their stories. They realized at this point that their stories were totally off. And it clued into them they each group had been given different clues that might have helped them create a story similar to the original but they had decided to take a creative route instead. So maybe if we try it again it will work differently. After the reading the discussion turned to topics like suicide and the holidays and cultural differences between the US and Japan.

Lesson Reflection #2

In the struggle to identify task-based lessons at the lower levels, I'm being mindful of what I do do with my classes in an effort to continually adjust and readjust lessons to move towards a more task-based learning environment. And it is an adjustment, because as I'm learning, I'm also teaching and training my co-teachers as well. Task-based lessons are not always the norm, but they do seem much more popular with the students as well as the teachers if that first step can be taken!

__________________________________________________

6小-3中学校　Typhoon Review Game

I've played this game with students from 6th grade to 9th grade. And everyone has loved it. It's a great review game and can be used with just about anything. But I've found the best way to use it is by requiring the students to answer questions and/or complete mini-tasks in order to score points. Depending how you structure it, it might be considered a mulit-mini-task lesson, if there is such a thing. The junior high students are divided into groups of 4, and each group is given a small white board. They are told to take turns writing their answers on the white board if that's what the task asks of them. But because each group has members of various levels this requires the group to work together if they want to be successful and have a chance at the typhoon score board.

Everytime the group performs/answers the task correctly they can pick points from the typhoon board. For example, "F4." I pull the sticky paper off and announce the points they are awarded for completing their task. The papers are labeled with points from 1-20 (5 points=1 house). And then there are "Typhoon" cards. If a group gets a "typhoon" they can erase the points of any other group--or blow their houses off the map! So sad, I know, but it's popular! And there are a few "Double Typhoons," allowing them to erase the points from two groups.

Here are the types of questions/tasks I've used with this age group:

• Simple word translation (good as a warm-up to the game or if time is running out)
• Unscramble the sentence
• Who am I? quiz (listen and they write the answer)
• Geography quiz
• Prepare a speech (self-introduction, favorite food, favorite sport, etc.)
• Word search (3 fastest teams get points)
• Complete a puzzle
• Finish a maze (spelling, ABC's, etc.)
• Olympic Medals--printed from the internet and I asked questions about the information on the page (i.e. How many gold medals to Australia get?)
• Put a Map on the board and ask them how to get from Point A to Point B
• Speed Reading Activities
• Look at a picture and make a few sentences

The elementary school students haven't practiced writing, so I focus on speaking, listening activities with them. And depending on the class and their confidence, I have done a pure vocab review. But with other classes, I've assigned them to give a speech, answer questions, etc. If the student representative for that round doesn't know the answer, they are supposed to ask their group for help! It's fun to watch them work together and teach each other!

Lesson Reflection #1

I'll be posting reflections and observations on lessons sometimes. I used to keep track of each lesson when I first started teaching, but that became too time consuming. However, I think part of improving is taking time to reflect on what worked and what didn't. I'm also trying to determine how often I use TBL vs. PPP. Before I started teaching in Japan, I took a TEFL course in Prague and they hammered PPP into us. They said there were other styles but PPP was the easiest to master as a teacher and was effective. All our submitted lessons had to have the three P's while teaching a specific skill (i.e. reading, writing, speaking or listening). So, when I first started, my lessons reflected that. Since starting the MA, I've tried to move away from that. I know my lessons have changed significantly but I'm not sure my lessons can be called TBL. I guess I'm striving for a balance of methods because I'm not totally convinced that there is one right way. I think there are many right ways and many good lessons. And that context is everything!

_____________________________________________

小学校 　４年生 Shopping Game

We repeated this lesson again because it was such a big hit the first time. But the second time we added money into the equation. Playing with money was VERY popular. The first time the shopping game was set up so that students would be able to practice and use

A: ____please

B: Here you are

A: Thank you

B: You're welcome

There were 6 groups with 6 shopping lists (6 items each: 2 fruits, 2 vegetables, 2 supermarket items). There are 3 shops: Fruit Shop, Vegetable Shop and the Supermarket (the flashcards are the shopping items). The students have practiced and studied all the vocab, so this was a chance to use it in a game. Each group decides on an order (janken works best) and the first person gets to be a shopkeeper. There are two shopkeepers per shop. And of course it's all about speed...the fastest team to finish shopping gets, well, they get the grand prize of being the fastest! This worked great the first time, with both 3rd　& 4th grade.

Second time around, I put prices on all the food items. Now each team was given $20 (www.mes-english.com). The prices were rigged so that each shopping list required $19. If the group got all the items on the list and had $1, they successfully completed the shopping task. Giving a specific dialogue gets more complicated with money involved. So I decided to let them work it out and see what happened. They already knew the basics...now they needed to figure out how to pay for it. We had to practice "four dollars" because they were falling back on "四ドル” but most of them got it. So once they started shopping, the typical conversation went something like this:

A: _____ please

B: $4

A: Here you are (giving money).

B: Here you are (giving the flashcard)

A: Thank you

B: You're Welcome

And there were lots of other variations, especially when kids needed change or didn't get the change they needed. It always cracks me up when, even thought it's a race, the kids refuse to leave the shop until the shopkeeper says "You're welcome". After each group has completed their list, we trade lists and new students get to be shopkeepers until the class ends.

Is this TBL?? I guess there were some pre-task lessons throughout the year...practicing the vocab and learning the dialogue. And now we are building on it with this shopping game. Using the money and letting them come up with their own conversations seemed to work well. Although there wasn't a focus on form or anything like that at the end. The bell rings and well, they keep shopping, but I gotta get to another class. Also, I'm not sure how necessary that step is in the elementary eikaiwa class.

I hadn't really given them the opportunity to discover their own dialogue (I know it's not much, but baby steps) in elementary lessons before because the plans that I work with don't allow for it and many homeroom teachers won't allow it. And the plans I work with have NO TBL type lessons. They are all grammar-translation stuff! It's horrible! So, I've been trying to add in stuff here and there. This is one lesson that I've done with several classes and grades now....and it's a super big hit! In one class students were chanting, "もう一回。” We had to promise them we'd do it again! So, I think the students are ready for more TBL-style lessons and frankly, so am I. But it's the thinking and planning that's the hard part. Oh...and communicating it to the homeroom teacher.